RSS Readers lose the art of the site
I use the Google Reader RSS reader. Its a great reader, easy to use and clearly presented. Its awesome that if you read from several different machines it keeps track of what you’ve read. Of course, its Google!. I read a few feeds (not as many as Mcq, wow, he’s a pro) so a reader is a nice way to keep up with the changes. Much more sensible than going to a site just to see if anything has changed.
When you use a reader though, you lose so much of the formatting of the post. Its like, “all that matters is the text content”. OK you get the pictures too (generally, but not always), but what you lose is the art of the site. I spent a lot of time choosing a template for my blog site, which like many of you acts also as my home page, and further time tweaking it. For example, I widened it a little so the posts would sit with nicer proportions and accommodate a larger picture easily. And I did some novice CSS hacking so all the posts were automatically fully justified. I like the look of my site and appreciate the look of others’.
Funny, when I first starting learning about RSS and readers, I assumed they’d just inform you of a new post but that you’d always go the site to read, or that somehow the site would be embedded in your reader.
Well I guess its the same as using a book reader for a PDA vs. the actual book. Me, I like the tactile nature of books, the smell and weight of the paper, the way you can flip to find where you last left off because the binding naturally tells you. I like magazines so you can sit in a comfy chair or in the tub. I’ve tried reading from a laptop in the tub but its uncomfortable, and despite the fact it was on batteries, Patti thought it just looked dangerous (at least for the laptop!). I marvel at font choices. I love the art of presentation.
The substance must be there too, but must we throw away the aesthetic connection for convenience?





